The
Professional
Sam Earns His Money The Old
Fashioned Way, at the Horse Track
By Justin Sanders
It's a
typical day at Portland Meadows.
Outside, the bettors cluster around
the track, cheering on the horses,
stubbornly battling the pouring
rain. Inside, they're clustered
around television screens, cheering
on horses from other tracks around
the country. Cigarette smoke clouds
the air. There's a perpetual
shuffling sound as gamblers sift
frantically through countless
copies of the Daily Racing Form,
searching for the one elusive clue
that will mark the winning stud.
The haze and excitement make it
easy to overlook a small,
unassuming door in the far left
corner, near the concession stand
and the bathrooms. Attached to this
door is a key pad. Enter a code
onto the pad, and the door opens
into a plain, almost ugly room with
beige shag carpeting and vinyl
chairs that have surely been there
for going on four decades. A large
window adorns the far side, looking
out onto the track. Monitors are
everywhere, some showing races,
most blank and silent. There is
none of the hustle bustle from the
world outside. This room has a
different kind of energy, a
tension. Something serious is going
on.
A few average looking men are
scattered about. They don’t speak,
and they don’t look up from the
piles of papers, folders, and
journals strewn on the tables in
front of them. Here and there a
cell phone rings.
Libraries are louder than this
place.
Gone are the boisterous festivities
of the outside world—and that’s
exactly how the room’s occupants
like it. This space is not so much
a sports venue as it is their
office. They place money on horses,
but they are gamblers in only the
loosest sense of the word. For
unlike most gamblers, the odds are
in their favor. The track is their
business, this room their corporate
headquarters. They are professional
gamblers, and they need this
sanctuary to do their work.
HANDICAPPING 101
A tall, shambling man with sharp
blue eyes, a moustache, and a
tropical shirt greets me at the
door. This is the man I have been
waiting to talk to: a pro. Before
finding him, I wandered the Meadows
for several hours, talking with a
slew of regulars who throw down
large amounts of cash at the track
daily, but do not and cannot
support themselves on the money
they make.
Finally I approached the president
of Portland Meadows himself, Arthur
McFadden, who informed me that
there are only two, maybe three
regulars that fit the definition I
am seeking, and they value their
privacy. He made some calls, and
set me up with this guy—I’ll call
him Sam. Sam is very adamant that I
don’t use his real name.
“You get too many people bothering
you,” he says. “They want winners.
They want the work that you’ve done
on the horses. That’s why we’re in
this club. That’s why we have that
locked, coded door. It’s imperative
for quiet study and not having to
deal with questions.”
I wonder if that was a hidden barb
directed at me because I’m a
journalist, a questioner. But I am
too excited by his words to be
deterred.
“Work.”
“Quiet study.”
I am fascinated by gambling as an
occupational form; a bona fide
business where an income is
assured. Thousands and thousands of
people come through Portland
Meadows every year. Two or three
have what it takes to do what Sam
does. For the last 9 months, Sam
has not worked a job, only gambled.
He is listed with the IRS as a
professional gambler. A few months
ago, he won $12,000 in a month. The
next month he lost $14,000. The
next month he broke back even. That
is the nature of the game; there
are a tiny amount of winners, many,
many losers, and a few like Sam,
who win some and lose some, but
never lose everything.
Sam talks and I listen. He informs
me that the skill of horseracing,
the way to be successful at it,
lies in what is known as
“handicapping,” or, as Sam puts it,
the art of “assimilating
information correctly.”
Sam is an information assimilation
machine, an endless fountain of
horseracing and handicapping
knowledge. It pours out of him like
water, and I become aware during
the interview of how difficult my
task will be later, when I try to
make sense of it all. He begins his
lecture with deceptive simplicity.
“Write this down,” he says.
I glance at the running tape
recorder I’m holding in my hand,
but pick up a pad and paper for
fear he’ll stop talking if I don’t.
For the first time since I’ve met
him, he speaks slowly. What he is
revealing is his doctrine, his Ten
Commandments, though there are only
three of them.
“Speed,” he says. “Early speed,
pressing speed, and late speed, are
the three determining factors in
the outcome of all races. That is
the foundation of handicapping.” I
nod my head. Sounds easy enough. He
elaborates: “Ninety-five percent of
the time, [horses] run their same
type of race. If they go to the
front, they go to the front; if
they’re a deep closer, they’re a
deep closer.”
He explains that the first thing
any good handicapper does is look
at the racing history of all the
horses to see what kind of
finishers they are. The horses that
tend to “go to the front,” will
have a record of performing well at
sprints (races less than a mile in
length). They start races strong
and in the front of the pack. They
also tire quickly. Horses known as
“deep closers” start off slow, but
speed up as the race deepens,
performing well in longer races,
outlasting the early frontrunners.
It is this assimilation of
information—this interpretation of
factors—in which Sam excels. When
he “plays speed,” the formula is
simple: In a sprint, don’t bet on
the deep closers; in a longer race,
don’t bet on the sprinters. It
sounds so simple, like anyone could
do it. But of course there’s a
reason why Sam is a successful
gambler, while 99.9 percent of the
rest of the pack are not. On the
iceberg of factors that Sam takes
into account every time he
handicaps, speed is only the tip.
BLOOD AND STATISTICS: THE PLOT
THICKENS
Sam opens up his Racing Form, a
daily periodical that addresses all
things horseracing, including
detailed information on each horse
in every race across the country.
It’s subtitled “AMERICA’S TURF
AUTHORITY SINCE 1894.”
Today (Thursday) there are 36 races
covered. A seemingly endless stream
of names rolls across every page:
Lexi’s Habit... Darling Demon...
Kinzie Woo... Lil’ Miss Obnoxious,
and so on. A minimum of six horses
run in each race, and some races
have as many as 24 horses, which
means there are at least three to
four hundred horses covered in
today’s form. On the weekends,
there are many, many more.
The Form is a massive web of
statistics, names, and
abbreviations. For the novice,
looking at it is akin to perusing
an organic chemistry textbook. Sam
pulls out a Form from two months
ago, points to a number listed on
one of the races held at the
Belmont track in New York.
“This is the variant number here,”
he says.
Then he points outside towards the
track at Portland Meadows, where a
heavy rain coats everything.
“When it rains like it is now, the
topsoil gets pushed to the inside
because the oval is banked around
the turns, the racing surface is
slanted, and so it gradually gets
forced down and the topsoil can be
heavier, and so the outside part of
the track is better.”
I blink. There is a statistic that
describes the condition of the
track, and that somehow helps Sam
figure out which horse to bet on. I
can glean that much.
Sam points. “The variant number
here is 10. September 15... Belmont
track was off 10 lengths. [At 10
lengths] you know that the inside
ground was good.”
He points to a horse that ran on
the inside part of the track during
the Belmont race, and lost. I
scratch my head. There is a
statistic for determining which
part of the track the horse likes
to run on.
“This guy ran poorly on the best
part of the track,” says Sam.
“He’s no good in his next start.”
Horse speed, track condition, and
position. So far, so good. I’m
keeping pace. And then we round the
bend, and Sam starts to dig in deep
as he heads for the stretch. He
points to another mysterious box
hovering above one of the races.
“This race is for 2-year-old
fillies who were born in New York.
That’s what that box
means—state-bred. Now, the
incentive to run and breed in New
York is that at the end of the year
the state-bred bonus pool kicks in.
From the total pool in New York,
which is six to eight million
dollars, two percent goes to the
state-bred fund, and from that fund
at the end of the year, the owners
of the horses who ran first,
second, or third get incentive
bonuses for breeding and racing in
New York.”
He points to one of the horse’s
statistics. The name of the horse’s
owner is listed. “So at the end of
the year if this guy, Marmac, has
seven wins in New York, with his
New York breds, he’s going to get
maybe another $100,000 because he
bred and raced in New York. As a
handicapper trying to survive in
this deadly game, you have to
understand what that means. You
have to follow the course of
information [in the Racing Form]
and know that a race is an open
race, but within are some state
bred horses who are not as well
bred, or intended to win today
because they’re state breds. Why
run against open company, against
better horses, when you can run
against your own kind and get
incentive money?”
There are statistics for how much
extra cash owners get if their
horses win in the state they were
born in. There are open races,
composed of horses from one state,
and there are state-bred races,
composed of horses from many
states.
Sam assimilates this information
and uses it to read the owners’
minds. If an owner’s horse is
racing in an open race, the owner
will often let the horse lose in
order to save its strength for an
up and coming state-bred race,
where it will get the normal money
for winning, plus incentive money
for winning in its native state.
I rub my eyes. My head is starting
to spin a bit. Meanwhile, Sam gears
up for the final sprint.
“Medication,” he says, grinning at
the next topic. “Lasix is a
bleeding medication that keeps
horses from bleeding in their
lungs; if their lungs fill up with
blood during the race, they stop
running.”
I stare at him. “Are blood-filled
lungs a common occurrence in horse
racing?” I ask.
“Up until 1992, Lasix was illegal,”
he replies. “They legalized it
because so many horses bled and the
public was getting ripped off by
horses who would stop in the middle
of a race. As a handicapper, you
would come back to the next race
and… do what? Will he bleed today?
Will he not? That was huge, and
then the scientists developed Lasix.
That stopped the bleeding.”
Speed. Track condition. Race
position. Owner psychology. Blood.
I don’t know if it’s more amazing
that there are actually statistics
for all these things, or if it’s
more amazing that handicappers like
Sam actually know how to use them
to their advantage.
CLEANING THE CASH FLOW
A race starts on one of the
monitors and Sam gets up abruptly
to watch.
“I’ve got this horse big here.” He
leans in close to the screen.
“Come on, Jimmy! Come on!” The race
ends and he sits back down. He is
nonchalant.
“What happened?” I ask.
He shrugs. “I won. More firepower
for later. Right now I’m up $520.
Today is safe. I’ll hit a couple
other things and I’ll lose back
some maybe, or I could walk away,
but if I stay and play, I won’t
lose money today. And I have the
potential, with what I’ve studied
for later on, to have a big day
because now I have some firepower.
And when a player has my kind of
information and history and
longevity in this game, he can
smash things. I can bet a $50
Exacta and get it 25 times and it
pays $40. Boom. There’s $900.”
Horse betting terminology is
another story in itself, and I
don’t have the chops to understand
what Sam is talking about, but it
sounds impressive. It also raises
the question of what he does with
all that money once he wins it. Is
it under the table? Does it get
taxed?
Sam breaks into a broad grin.
Clearly he loves talking about his
money as much as he loves talking
about earning his money. He pulls
out a stack of receipts from the
track.
“Two dollar bets over $600 are
reportable to the IRS, and the
track will send them a copy, and
you have to deal with those pricks.
They all know me, every agent in
this town. I’ve taken them to tax
court and battled them to a
standstill.”
Sam seems offended and hurt that
the IRS would ever question him
about his taxes, which is
surprising considering what he
rather gleefully says next:
“With no income and listed as a pro
gambler, I get to incorporate (into
his taxes) periodicals, race forms,
programs, admissions—which I get
all free anyway (because he is a
VIP), but they don’t know that.
Seating. It’s three dollars for a
seat, 300 days a year; that’s a
$900 write-off.”
He holds up the Racing Form. “These
cost four bucks, and there’s two of
them a day on the East Coast and
West Coast. That’s eight dollars a
day times 300. Line 26 of Schedule
A in your 10-40 form states you can
offset winnings with losses up to
the amount of the winnings. In 2001
I filed for $216,000 [!!] in
signers [track receipts] that the
IRS had record of. Guess how much I
filed for?”
“$216,000,” I answer, somewhat
breathless.
I am impressed that a professional
gambler can actually write off his
losses as a business expense, but
astounded by Sam’s ability to pull
numbers, rules, and laws out of
thin air, then weave them together
to work in his advantage. Of
course, at this point, I shouldn’t
be surprised. It’s all he does all
day, after all, so it makes sense
he would be good at it by now. I
wonder about his personal life and
if it is inhibited at all by this
obsession with information.
ADDICTED TO LOVE
When I inquire about his life
outside the track, a strange thing
happens: Sam leans back in his
chair and looks at the floor. When
the conversation topic was
horseracing he was upright, hands
on his knees, his blue eyes staring
fiercely into mine. When the topic
is life outside of racing, he
slouches, mumbles. His hands fold
in his lap, then move to behind his
head, then back to his lap. He
talks briefly about trying to quit
gambling in 1993 to make his
fiancee happy. He failed, and the
relationship eventually ended.
“So it’s hard to have relationships
with this lifestyle?” I ask.
He gazes out at the track. “Yeah...
you sacrifice that.”
I think back to a few weeks ago,
when I was scouring the local
Gamblers Anonymous sect,
shamelessly interrogating severely
addicted people with the hopes I
could find someone like Sam. I
never did find anyone at GA, mostly
because I felt bad for being
exploitative; for trying to use
people who had truly fucked their
lives as a source of entertainment.
At the time, my definition of
professional gamblers were people
who could gamble full-time without
letting it consume them to the
point where it ruined their lives.
The people at GA obviously do not
fit that bill, so I moved on.
Sam has yet to ruin his life, but
he will be the first to admit he is
as consumed as anyone else, and
clearly it has affected his life in
ways that are not always positive.
He does have an addiction to
something.
“Not gambling,” he says. “Horse
racing. There’s a huge distinction.
I spent 33 days in a mental health
facility in 1993, an experimental
compulsive gamblers wing of this
hospital… they tried to get me to
say I was a compulsive gambler, and
up until my last day there I
wouldn’t admit it, so they kept
saying, ’You’re never gonna be
cured.’ And I kept saying, ’I don’t
bet football, I don’t play poker, I
don’t go play blackjack. I am not a
gambler.’”
The topic is back where he likes
it. He leans forward again, winks.
“I am a professional turf
speculator.”
Sam is addicted to handicapping. He
is addicted to preparation, to
study, to assimilation, to work.
Sam is a true workaholic. I notice
the gleam in his eyes, the smile
playing at the corners of his mouth
as he watches the horses fly past.
Everyone would be a workaholic if
their work was as enjoyable to them
as Sam’s is to him.
“There’s no funner place to be than
the race track and gambling,” he
says, standing up.
Another race is beginning.
“And the second funnest place to be
is at the race track, gambling, and
losing.”